NAAC
Data Verification & Validation
Self-Study Report
I. Extended Profile
Undertaking submitted by Head of the Institute with IIQA
II. Quantitative (QnM) and Qualitative (QlM) Parameters
Criterion 1 Curricular Aspects
| Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation | |||
| 1.1.1 | QlM | The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery and conduct of continuous internal Assessment | |
| Key Indicator- 1.2 Academic Flexibility | |||
| 1.2.1 | QnM | Number of Add on /Certificate/Value added programs offered during the last five years | |
| 1.2.2 | QnM | Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Add-on/Value added programs as against the total number of students during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment | |||
| 1.3.1 | QlM | Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum | |
| 1.3.2 | QnM | Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/internships | |
| Key Indicator- 1.4 Feedback System | |||
| 1.4.1 | QnM | Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambiance of the institution from various stakeholders and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website |
|
Criterion 2 Teaching Learning and Evaluation
| Key Indicator- 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile | |||
| 2.1.1 | QnM | Enrolment percentage | |
| 2.1.2 | QnM | Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 2.2 Student Teacher Ratio | |||
| 2.2.1 | QnM | Student – Full time Teacher Ratio | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 2.3 Teaching- Learning Process | |||
| 2.3.1 | QlM | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences using ICT tools | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality | |||
| 2.4.1 | QnM | Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years | Proof- Click here |
| 2.4.2 | QnM | Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. /M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms | |||
| 2.5.1 | QlM | Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome | |||
| 2.6.1 | QlM | Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and attainment of POs and COs are evaluated | Proof- Click here |
| 2.6.2 | QnM | Pass percentage of Students during last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey | |||
| 2.7.1 | QnM | Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process | |
Criterion 3 Research, Innovations, and Extension
| Key Indicator 3.1- Resource Mobilization for Research | |||
| 3.1.1 | QnM | Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 3.2 Innovation Ecosystem | |||
| 3.2.1 | QlM | Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations and has initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge | Proof- Click here |
| 3.2.2 | QnM | Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship conducted during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 3.3 Research Publication and Awards | |||
| 3.3.1 | QnM | Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC care list during the last five years | |
| 3.3.2 | QnM | Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 3.4 Extension Activities | |||
| 3.4.1 | QlM | Extension activities are carried out in the neighbourhood community, sensitizing students to social issues, for their holistic development, and impact thereof. | |
| 3.4.2 | QlM | Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognised bodies | Proof- Click here |
| 3.4.3 | QnM | Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC etc., during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 3.5. Collaboration | |||
| 3.5.1 | QnM | The number of MoUs, collaborations/linkages for Faculty exchange, Student exchange, Internship, Field trip, On-the- job training, research and other academic activities, during the last five years | |
Criterion 4 Infrastructure and Learning Resources
| Key Indicator 4.1- Physical Facilities | |||
| 4.1.1 | QlM | Availability of adequate infrastructure and physical facilities viz., classrooms, laboratories, ICT facilities, cultural activities, gymnasium, yoga centre etc. in the institution | Proof- Click here |
| 4.1.2 | QnM | Percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation during last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 4.2 Library as a learning Resource | |||
| 4.2.1 | QlM | Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), subscription to e-resources, amount spent on purchase of books, journals and per day usage of library | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 4.3 IT Infrastructure | |||
| 4.3.1 | QlM | Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection | Proof- Click here |
| 4.3.2 | QnM | Student – Computer ratio | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure | |||
| 4.4.1 | QnM | Percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure excluding salary component during the last five years | |
Criterion 5 Student Support and Progression
| Key Indicator 5.1- Student Support | |||
| 5.1.1 | QnM | Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the Government and Non-Government agencies during last five years | |
| 5.1.2 | QnM | Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution include the following 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. ICT/computing skills | |
| 5.1.3 | QnM | Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years | |
| 5.1.4 | QnM | The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 5.2 Student Progression | |||
| 5.2.1 | QnM | Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years | |
| 5.2.2 | QnM | Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 5.3 Student Participation and Activities | |||
| 5.3.1 | QnM | Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level during the last five years | |
| 5.3.2 | QnM | Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 5.4 Alumni Engagement | |||
| 5.4.1 | QlM | There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services | Proof- Click here |
Criterion 6 Governance, Leadership, and Management
| Key Indicator- 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership | |||
| 6.1.1 | QlM | The governance and leadership is in accordance with vision and mission of the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participation in the institutional governance | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment | |||
| 6.2.1 | QlM | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, deployment of institutional Strategic/perspective/development plan etc | Proof- Click here |
| 6.2.2 | QnM | Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies | |||
| 6.3.1 | QlM | The institution has effective welfare measures and Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff | Proof- Click here |
| 6.3.2 | QnM | Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years | |
| 6.3.3 | QnM | Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years | |
| Key Indicator- 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization | |||
| 6.4.1 | QlM | Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external) | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System | |||
| 6.5.1 | QlM | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities | Proof- Click here |
| 6.5.2 | QnM | Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for Improvements 2. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)/membership of international networks 3. Participation in NIRF 4. any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA, ISO Certification etc | |
Criterion 7 Institutional Values and Best Practices
| Key Indicator 7.1- Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities | |||
| Gender Equity and celebration of days of National/International commemoration | |||
| 7.1.1 | QlM | Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity and Institutional initiatives to celebrate / organize national and international commemorative days, events and festivals during the last five years | Proof- Click here |
| Environmental Consciousness and Sustainability and Divyangjan friendly initiatives | |||
| 7.1.2 | QnM | The Institution has facilities and initiatives for 1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures 2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste 3. Water conservation 4. Green campus initiatives 5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment | Proof- Click here |
| 7.1.3 | QnM | Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following- 1. Green audit / Environment audit; 2. Energy audit 3. Clean and green campus initiatives; 4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities | Proof- Click here |
| Inclusion, Situatedness, Human values & professional ethics | |||
| 7.1.4 | QlM | Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens | Proof- Click here |
| Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices | |||
| 7.2.1 | QlM | Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual | |
| Key Indicator- 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness | |||
| 7.3.1 | QlM | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | |
DVV
Phone
Location
Sy.No.376/7, Batasingaram (V), Abdullapur Mettu (M), R.R. District, Telangana-501512. INDIA.
Have a word to say?
Connect to Learning
